Please explain to me, why it's perfectly fine for pictures of GW Bush to be posted around the web being compared to a chimpanzee making funny faces and the major majority of the comments think that it's hilarious and right on the money, yet a similar comparison of Obama is made to Curious George and the comments are derogetory to whomever posted it? As if posting the similar features of Obama and Curious George is somehow MORE demeaning than posting pictures for GW and a chimp. I don't quite get it.
